Oompaville: Difference between revisions

From Daniel Larson Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Oompaville is a commentary YouTuber who published a [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khuPjWehjdE video covering Daniel Larson by not searching him on Google]. On February 25, 2023, Within less than a couple of day the video had gotten over 200,000 views, making it one of the most viewed Daniel Larson videos on YouTube. Fans choose Oompaville's video more better on the lore of Daniel than Turkey Tom's one.")
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Oompaville is a commentary YouTuber who published a [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khuPjWehjdE video covering Daniel Larson by not searching him on Google]. On February 25, 2023, Within less than a couple of day the video had gotten over 200,000 views, making it one of the most viewed Daniel Larson videos on YouTube. Fans choose Oompaville's video more better on the lore of Daniel than [[Turkey Tom]]'s one.
Oompaville (known by his name Caleb) is an American commentary YouTuber who published a [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khuPjWehjdE video covering Daniel Larson] on February 25, 2023.
 
Within less than a couple of days the video had gotten over 200,000 views, making it one of the most viewed Daniel Larson videos on YouTube.
 
Oompaville's video is well-researched and is seen as a credible and accurate summary of the Daniel Larson saga. Oompaville using [[Papa Gut]] as a source of information is generally seen as inadvisable, but it does not seem like he gave Oompaville any inaccurate information.

Revision as of 21:45, 5 April 2023

Oompaville (known by his name Caleb) is an American commentary YouTuber who published a video covering Daniel Larson on February 25, 2023.

Within less than a couple of days the video had gotten over 200,000 views, making it one of the most viewed Daniel Larson videos on YouTube.

Oompaville's video is well-researched and is seen as a credible and accurate summary of the Daniel Larson saga. Oompaville using Papa Gut as a source of information is generally seen as inadvisable, but it does not seem like he gave Oompaville any inaccurate information.