Daniel Larson Wiki talk:Editor's Guide: Difference between revisions

From Daniel Larson Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Starting a discussion about what pages should and shouldn't be allowed / subject for deletion.)
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Going to update the guidelines for what deserves a page and what might be subject for deletion. I think it might be best to list examples over defining strict rules, to start here is what I think could be examples of pages we are looking for: people and places highly referenced by Daniel, major incidents and events, "eras" and "arcs", "meta" pages about Daniel like "managers" or "finances". As for examples of pages that shouldn't belong: "Content creators" that aren't seriously involved with Daniel, pages for "future content", and pages with less than a paragraphs worth of content... [https://sonichu.com/cwcki/CWCki:Article_naming I think the Chris Chan Wiki is a good reference as well]. Please share what you think should be found on this wiki! [[User:Admin|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin|talk]])
Going to update the guidelines for what deserves a page and what might be subject for deletion. I think it might be best to list examples over defining strict rules, to start here is what I think could be examples of pages we are looking for: people and places highly referenced by Daniel, major incidents and events, "eras" and "arcs", "meta" pages about Daniel like "managers" or "finances". As for examples of pages that shouldn't belong: "Content creators" that aren't seriously involved with Daniel, pages for "future content", and pages with less than a paragraphs worth of content... [https://sonichu.com/cwcki/CWCki:Article_naming I think the Chris Chan Wiki is a good reference as well]. Please share what you think should be found on this wiki! [[User:Admin|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin|talk]])
Personally, there are many pages on the wiki that do not need to be here. For example, Liquid Larson, as he is an example of a content creator who has not been directly referenced by Daniel. Theres no need for pages dedicated to "future content", and personally, things like Daniel mentioning Chris Chan should be kept as footnotes in the timeline/archives of his community tab. I'm more for stricter rules than a list of examples, but do what you want [[User:KanamoriKamper|KanamoriKamper]] ([[User talk:KanamoriKamper|talk]])

Latest revision as of 15:20, 26 December 2023

Going to update the guidelines for what deserves a page and what might be subject for deletion. I think it might be best to list examples over defining strict rules, to start here is what I think could be examples of pages we are looking for: people and places highly referenced by Daniel, major incidents and events, "eras" and "arcs", "meta" pages about Daniel like "managers" or "finances". As for examples of pages that shouldn't belong: "Content creators" that aren't seriously involved with Daniel, pages for "future content", and pages with less than a paragraphs worth of content... I think the Chris Chan Wiki is a good reference as well. Please share what you think should be found on this wiki! Admin (talk)

Personally, there are many pages on the wiki that do not need to be here. For example, Liquid Larson, as he is an example of a content creator who has not been directly referenced by Daniel. Theres no need for pages dedicated to "future content", and personally, things like Daniel mentioning Chris Chan should be kept as footnotes in the timeline/archives of his community tab. I'm more for stricter rules than a list of examples, but do what you want KanamoriKamper (talk)